Tag Archives: JavaScript programming language

JavaScript inheritance example

javascript, micro tutorial, , , ,

JavaScript and inheritance

Almost for everybody the JavaScript way of implementing inheritance is odd. For a typical programmer it should look more C or Java like, but is not. However to give you a breve example, I’d like to make two objects, and to make the second one to inherit from the first. Thus I’d like to show how neither parent or child objects interact once they have been instanciated.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

	var parent = function() {};
	parent.prototype = {
		name : 'parent',
		m : 1,
		a : function() {
			console.log(this.name + ': ' + this.m);
		},
		setM : function( value ) {
			this.m = value;
		}
	};
 
	var child = function() {};
	child.prototype = new parent;
	child.prototype.name = 'child';
 
	var parentObj = new parent();
	var childObj = new child();
 
	parentObj.a();
	parentObj.setM(12);
 
	childObj.a();
	childObj.setM(3);
 
	parentObj.a();
	childObj.a();

However this describes the ability to make complex JavaScript inheritance patterns. The complete source’s here.

jQuery localStorage plugin (alpha)

javascript, , , ,

After submitting the HTML5 localStorage wrap plugin for jQuery, there comes the new version, hopefully more stable and reliable!

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55

(function(jQuery) {
 
   var supported = true;
   if (typeof localStorage == 'undefined' || typeof JSON == 'undefined')
      supported = false;
   else
      var ls = localStorage;
 
   this.setItem = function(key, value, lifetime) {
      if (!supported)
         return false;
 
      if (typeof lifetime == 'undefined')
         lifetime = 60000;
 
      ls.setItem(key, JSON.stringify(value));
      var time = new Date();
      ls.setItem('meta_ct_'+key, time.getTime());
      ls.setItem('meta_lt_'+key, lifetime);
   };
 
   this.getItem = function(key) {
      if (!supported)
         return false;
 
      var time = new Date();
      if (time.getTime() - ls.getItem('meta_ct_'+key) > ls.getItem('meta_lt_'+key)) {
         ls.removeItem(key);
         ls.removeItem('meta_ct_'+key);
         ls.removeItem('meta_lt_'+key);
         return false;
      }
      return JSON.parse(ls.getItem(key));
   };
 
   this.removeItem = function(key) {
      if (!supported)
         return false;
 
      ls.removeItem(key);
      ls.removeItem('meta_ct_'+key);
      ls.removeItem('meta_lt_'+key);
      return true;
   };
 
   jQuery.localStorage = this;
 
})(jQuery);
 
if (!$.localStorage.getItem('test')) {
   $.localStorage.setItem('test', ['stoimen'], 5000);
   console.log('dynamic');
} else {
   console.log('from cache');
}

Storing JavaScript objects in html5 localStorage

javascript, micro tutorial, , , , , , , , , ,

There is a rising new age of HTML5, which comes with very nice features as video tag and localStorage. What localStorage is? In fact we have been waiting for long time to have something that give us the power of storing more and more on the client side. That’s because the net is becoming larger and therefore heavy.

Imagine if you have the possibility to store large JSON returned from an AJAX call on the client. That’s now reality with the localStorage object in HTML5 and it can be accessed with something like this code:

localStorage.setItem(key, value);
alert(localStorage.getItem(key));

Can we store entire objects?

Yes there is a way extending a bit the logic of the code above. The localStorage in fact stores only strings, but what about arrays and objects. You can additionally use JSON global objects and its two methods – stringify and parse:

var a = JSON.stringify({name:'obj'});
alert(JSON.parse(a));

Do browsers support all that?

Of course … not! localStorage is supported by Firefox 3.5+, Chrome 2+, Safari 4+ and MSIE 8+. The solution is not to rely on browser version, but to check for object existence, and than to combine both techniques:

localStorage.setItem('a', JSON.stringify({ name : 'obj' }));
alert(JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('a')));

CSS selectors – new look over them

css, , , , , , ,

How do you select?

When it comes to CSS selectors, most of us are using the most familiar selectors by id or class name. Something like:

.my-class {}
#my-id {}

But as you can see in most of the big JavaScript libraries, such as jQuery, you can improve the selection of element/s by using complex selector syntax.

Do you know the syntax?

Maybe yes, but maybe not! As I stumbled upon an interesting article on http://css-tricks.com
The Skinny on CSS Attribute Selectors.
The good part is that now you can use this powerful selector syntax to improve CSS.

Browsers

Because this is the most interesting part – yes it is supported by MSIE, and no – not before IE7, be careful if you’d like to support it.

How to detect a variable existence in JavaScript?

javascript, micro tutorial, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Preface

After reading one of the latest posts from Stoyan Stefanov’s blog – phpied.com I stumbled upon an interesting construction in JavaScript describing how to check an object property existence. I’m going to cover this case using as an example the console object, which comes with the Firebug enabled, and I think it may be very useful, just because this object is widely used, but doesn’t exists over all the browsers, even under Firefox when Firebug is disabled. This construction is known as the IN statement and it looks something like that:

property in object

which I’m going to cover later in details.

How you detect a variable existence?

There are three main ways to detect the existence of a property I see in my practice.

1. The most widely used:

if ( console ) { ... }

2. The second and more professional one:

if ( typeof console != 'undefined' ) { ... }

3. And finally the third and most unknown:

if ( console in window ) { ... }

Of course two of them are wrong! Which one should be changed?

Is everything working correctly? No!

Lets see how they are working. First of all I’m going to test all of them on Firefox 3.6 either with enabled and disabled Firebug, just shouting with old school’s alert().

Now the first one using the IN statement:

if ( console in window )
   alert('object exists!');
else
   alert('object doesn\'t exists!');

With Firebug disabled the answer is … nothing! No alert! That’s because the syntax is wrong. There’s an error within the IF statement. We should modify a bit the first row like that:

if ( 'console' in window )
   alert('object exists!');
else
   alert('object doesn\'t exists!');

Now everything’s OK. With a disabled Firebug the answer is: “object doesn’t exists!”, and after enabling it, normally the “object exists!”.

Lets move on the next example:

if ( console )
   alert('object exists!');
else
   alert('object doesn\'t exists!');

With Firebug enabled the answer is as we expect: “object exists!”, but after disabling it yet again – nothing?! Why’s that? Because the console object doesn’t exists anymore and the IF statement doesn’t return true or false, but simply crashes. How to modify the code? Simply by adding a window.console instead of console.

if ( window.console )
   alert('object exists!');
else
   alert('object doesn\'t exists!');

Than the answer is: “the object doesn’t exists!” after what we expected!

The third method is the mostly used, just because it’s completely clear what’s the goal of the IF statement:

if ( typeof console != 'undefined' )
   alert('object exists!');
else
   alert('object doesn\'t exists!');

In both disabled and enabled Firebug the answer is as expected!

Now the IN statement may be used if not for the console, but for checking the existence of a property of within an object.