<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FTP clients &#8211; stoimen&#039;s web log</title>
	<atom:link href="/tag/ftp-clients/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>on web development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 08:18:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>HTML5 geolocation &#8211; What If the User Doesn&#8217;t Share His Position?</title>
		<link>/2010/06/29/html5-geolocation-what-if-the-user-doesnt-share-his-position/</link>
		<comments>/2010/06/29/html5-geolocation-what-if-the-user-doesnt-share-his-position/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stoimen]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micro tutorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTP clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geolocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology/Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HTML5 Geolocation So far we were used to expect something like this from our mobile phones with built-in GPS support. Every image or video clip then was automatically &#8220;tagged&#8221; with latitude &#38; longitude geo data. With HTML5 coming features we discover new cool things we can do with our browsers. Such cool thing is the &#8230; <a href="/2010/06/29/html5-geolocation-what-if-the-user-doesnt-share-his-position/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">HTML5 geolocation &#8211; What If the User Doesn&#8217;t Share His Position?</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href="/2010/01/31/speed-up-the-javascript-it-can-change-dramatically-the-user-experience/" rel="bookmark" title="Speed up the JavaScript. It can change dramatically the user experience.">Speed up the JavaScript. It can change dramatically the user experience. </a></li>
<li><a href="/2011/02/04/reading-gps-latitude-and-longitude-from-image-and-video-files/" rel="bookmark" title="Reading GPS Latitude and Longitude from Image and Video Files">Reading GPS Latitude and Longitude from Image and Video Files </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/02/24/storing-javascript-objects-in-html5-localstorage/" rel="bookmark" title="Storing JavaScript objects in html5 localStorage">Storing JavaScript objects in html5 localStorage </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/03/04/does-firefox-play-mp4-h-264-within-the-html5-video-tag/" rel="bookmark" title="Does Firefox play mp4 h.264 within the HTML5 video tag?">Does Firefox play mp4 h.264 within the HTML5 video tag? </a></li>
</ol>
</div>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>HTML5 Geolocation</h2>
<p>So far we were used to expect something like this from our mobile phones with built-in GPS support. Every image or video clip then was automatically &#8220;tagged&#8221; with latitude &amp; longitude geo data. With HTML5 coming features we discover new cool things we can do with our browsers. Such cool thing is the geolocation.</p>
<p><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/geo-location.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1726" title="geo-location" src="/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/geo-location.jpg" alt="Geo Location" width="430" height="134" srcset="/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/geo-location.jpg 430w, /wp-content/uploads/2010/06/geo-location-300x93.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 430px) 100vw, 430px" /></a></p>
<h2>Support</h2>
<p>As you may guess not every browser is supporting these HTML5 features, but out in the web there is quite good collection of tables comparing different browsers and their support level.</p>
<h2>Firefox</h2>
<p>This &#8211; as expected is a browser that supports this geo tagging. First of all you&#8217;ve to allow your browser to use your geo coordinates, as this can be private information.</p>
<p><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/browser-geo-location.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1728" title="browser-geo-location" src="/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/browser-geo-location.png" alt="Browser GEO Location" width="430" height="51" srcset="/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/browser-geo-location.png 430w, /wp-content/uploads/2010/06/browser-geo-location-300x35.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 430px) 100vw, 430px" /></a></p>
<p>Once you do it you can access the geo coordinates, which by the way are quite accurate, with JavaScript.</p>
<h2>What if you don&#8217;t share your position?</h2>
<p>What happens if you don&#8217;t want to share your position? Actually I ran in this situation and as my application waited the coordinates &#8211; it was completely blocked.</p>
<p>The examples doesn&#8217;t show you something special. They simply describe how to get the coordinates, but doesn&#8217;t tell you what if the user doesn&#8217;t click on the &#8220;share&#8221; button.</p>
<pre lang="javascript">
if (!!navigator.geolocation) {
        navigator.geolocation.getCurrentPosition(getPos);
}
...

function getPos(position) 
{
    position.coords.latitude;
    position.coords.longitude;
}
</pre>
<p>Of course getPos() can be simply an anonymous function:</p>
<pre lang="javascript">
if (!!navigator.geolocation) {
        navigator.geolocation.getCurrentPosition(function(position) {
            position.coords.latitude;
            position.coords.longitude;
        });
}
</pre>
<p>Only the Firefox documentation tells you how to handle errors, simply add one more parameter &#8211; callback, for getCurrentPosition() method:</p>
<pre lang="javascript">
if (!!navigator.geolocation) {
        navigator.geolocation.getCurrentPosition(getPos, onError);
}
...

function getPos(position) 
{
    position.coords.latitude;
    position.coords.longitude;
}

function onError()
{
   // handle error
}
</pre>
<p>Now you know where you don&#8217;t want to be.</p>
<p><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/map-marker.jpeg"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/map-marker.jpeg" alt="Map Marker" title="map-marker" width="430" height="286" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1731" srcset="/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/map-marker.jpeg 430w, /wp-content/uploads/2010/06/map-marker-300x199.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 430px) 100vw, 430px" /></a></p>
<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>
<p>Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href="/2010/01/31/speed-up-the-javascript-it-can-change-dramatically-the-user-experience/" rel="bookmark" title="Speed up the JavaScript. It can change dramatically the user experience.">Speed up the JavaScript. It can change dramatically the user experience. </a></li>
<li><a href="/2011/02/04/reading-gps-latitude-and-longitude-from-image-and-video-files/" rel="bookmark" title="Reading GPS Latitude and Longitude from Image and Video Files">Reading GPS Latitude and Longitude from Image and Video Files </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/02/24/storing-javascript-objects-in-html5-localstorage/" rel="bookmark" title="Storing JavaScript objects in html5 localStorage">Storing JavaScript objects in html5 localStorage </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/03/04/does-firefox-play-mp4-h-264-within-the-html5-video-tag/" rel="bookmark" title="Does Firefox play mp4 h.264 within the HTML5 video tag?">Does Firefox play mp4 h.264 within the HTML5 video tag? </a></li>
</ol></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>/2010/06/29/html5-geolocation-what-if-the-user-doesnt-share-his-position/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vendor Prefixes in CSS</title>
		<link>/2010/03/27/vendor-prefixes-in-css/</link>
		<comments>/2010/03/27/vendor-prefixes-in-css/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stoimen]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cascading Style Sheets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTP clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Wide Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vendor Prefixes vs CSS3 Either are bad, because vendor prefixes work on specific browsers, while CSS3 is not implemented fully by those browsers. When talking about vendor prefixes in CSS, let me tell you in breve, what&#8217;s this. If you&#8217;d like to make rounded corner under Mozilla Firefox, you usually use a background image, but &#8230; <a href="/2010/03/27/vendor-prefixes-in-css/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Vendor Prefixes in CSS</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href="/2010/02/12/css-border-radius-vs-images/" rel="bookmark" title="CSS border-radius vs. images!">CSS border-radius vs. images! </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/02/17/htc-round-the-corners-on-ie/" rel="bookmark" title="HTC?! Round the corners on IE!">HTC?! Round the corners on IE! </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/02/04/css-effective-selector/" rel="bookmark" title="CSS effective selector">CSS effective selector </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/03/11/css-priority-the-difference-between-a-my-class-and-my-class/" rel="bookmark" title="CSS Priority: The Difference Between a.my-class and .my-class">CSS Priority: The Difference Between a.my-class and .my-class </a></li>
</ol>
</div>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Vendor Prefixes vs CSS3</h2>
<p>Either are bad, because vendor prefixes work on specific browsers, while CSS3 is not implemented fully by those browsers. When talking about vendor prefixes in CSS, let me tell you in breve, what&#8217;s this. If you&#8217;d like to make rounded corner under Mozilla Firefox, you usually use a background image, but there&#8217;s another way to do it &#8211; with Mozilla specific CSS:</p>
<pre lang="css">-moz-border-radius: 5px;
</pre>
<p>That&#8217;s bad because it works only on Mozilla based browsers, although there&#8217;s a webkit based similar syntax:</p>
<pre lang="css">-webkit-border-radius: 5px;
</pre>
<p>Even after that our &#8220;favorite&#8221; browser MSIE until version 9 is not displaying any rounded corners.</p>
<p>In other hand CSS3 gives us the possibility to write the simple:</p>
<pre lang="css">border-radius:5px;
</pre>
<p>which is not implemented in many currently used browsers, but it may be used for progressive enhancements.</p>
<h2>In Breve &#8230;</h2>
<p>Everybody&#8217;s talking about vendor prefixes after the famous <a href="http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2010/03/css_vendor_pref.html" target="_blank">post of PPK</a>, but there are both opinions &#8211; pros and cons. However it&#8217;s good to use it, but very carefully, and think about what CSS3 may give you!</p>
<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>
<p>Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href="/2010/02/12/css-border-radius-vs-images/" rel="bookmark" title="CSS border-radius vs. images!">CSS border-radius vs. images! </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/02/17/htc-round-the-corners-on-ie/" rel="bookmark" title="HTC?! Round the corners on IE!">HTC?! Round the corners on IE! </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/02/04/css-effective-selector/" rel="bookmark" title="CSS effective selector">CSS effective selector </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/03/11/css-priority-the-difference-between-a-my-class-and-my-class/" rel="bookmark" title="CSS Priority: The Difference Between a.my-class and .my-class">CSS Priority: The Difference Between a.my-class and .my-class </a></li>
</ol></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>/2010/03/27/vendor-prefixes-in-css/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PHP: detecting mobile device</title>
		<link>/2010/03/09/php-detecting-mobile-device/</link>
		<comments>/2010/03/09/php-detecting-mobile-device/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stoimen]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTP clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gecko]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X 10.5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology/Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebKit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HTTP_USER_AGENT Beside that most of the responses of $_SERVER[&#8216;HTTP_USER_AGENT&#8217;] may return, it appears that this is the most reliable way to track down a user agent with PHP. It is weird that most of the clients, i.e. Safari and Chrome will return something with Mozilla in it&#8217;s strings, but however it&#8217;s enough to track the &#8230; <a href="/2010/03/09/php-detecting-mobile-device/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">PHP: detecting mobile device</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href="/2010/03/22/php-mobile-devices-http_user_agent-strings/" rel="bookmark" title="PHP: Mobile Devices HTTP_USER_AGENT Strings">PHP: Mobile Devices HTTP_USER_AGENT Strings </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/03/18/mobile-internet-users-are-getting-more-important/" rel="bookmark" title="Mobile Internet Users are Getting More Important">Mobile Internet Users are Getting More Important </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/02/24/storing-javascript-objects-in-html5-localstorage/" rel="bookmark" title="Storing JavaScript objects in html5 localStorage">Storing JavaScript objects in html5 localStorage </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/03/17/stop-coding-iphone-apps-begin-with-html5-mobile-sites/" rel="bookmark" title="Stop Coding iPhone Apps, Begin with HTML5 Mobile Sites">Stop Coding iPhone Apps, Begin with HTML5 Mobile Sites </a></li>
</ol>
</div>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>HTTP_USER_AGENT</h2>
<p>Beside that most of the responses of <strong>$_SERVER[&#8216;HTTP_USER_AGENT&#8217;]</strong> may return, it appears that this is the most reliable way to track down a user agent with PHP. It is weird that most of the clients, i.e. Safari and Chrome will return something with Mozilla in it&#8217;s strings, but however it&#8217;s enough to track the &#8220;chrome&#8221; or &#8220;safari&#8221; sub strings.</p>
<p>All the examples bellow are from Mac OS X:</p>
<p>Firefox 3.6:</p>
<pre lang="html">
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6
</pre>
<p><em><strong>Note</strong>: there are both Mozilla and Firefox sub strings!</em></p>
<p>Safari 4:</p>
<pre lang="html">
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8; bg-bg) AppleWebKit/531.21.8 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.4 Safari/531.21.10
</pre>
<p>Chrome:</p>
<pre lang="html">
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.307.11 Safari/532.9
</pre>
<p><em><strong>Note</strong>: Here they are Mozilla, Chorme and Safari!!!</em></p>
<p>Opera:</p>
<pre lang="html">
Opera/9.80 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X; U; en) Presto/2.2.15 Version/10.10
</pre>
<h2>The day of mobile</h2>
<p>Nowadays it&#8217;s normal to make a site with the presumption it will be visible from mobile. The war between Nexus One from Google and iPhone from Apple is just beginning and with all those devices with wide screens everything&#8217;s becoming more complicated.</p>
<h2>User agent strings from Nexus One and iPhone</h2>
<p>Both are weird, but both contain the keyword &#8211; &#8220;mobile&#8221; and that may help you make a check with something like this PHP snippet:</p>
<pre lang="php">
<?php
$mobile = !!(FALSE !== strstr(strtolower($_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT']), 'mobile'));
?>
</pre>
<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>
<p>Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href="/2010/03/22/php-mobile-devices-http_user_agent-strings/" rel="bookmark" title="PHP: Mobile Devices HTTP_USER_AGENT Strings">PHP: Mobile Devices HTTP_USER_AGENT Strings </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/03/18/mobile-internet-users-are-getting-more-important/" rel="bookmark" title="Mobile Internet Users are Getting More Important">Mobile Internet Users are Getting More Important </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/02/24/storing-javascript-objects-in-html5-localstorage/" rel="bookmark" title="Storing JavaScript objects in html5 localStorage">Storing JavaScript objects in html5 localStorage </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/03/17/stop-coding-iphone-apps-begin-with-html5-mobile-sites/" rel="bookmark" title="Stop Coding iPhone Apps, Begin with HTML5 Mobile Sites">Stop Coding iPhone Apps, Begin with HTML5 Mobile Sites </a></li>
</ol></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>/2010/03/09/php-detecting-mobile-device/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Firefox play mp4 h.264 within the HTML5 video tag?</title>
		<link>/2010/03/04/does-firefox-play-mp4-h-264-within-the-html5-video-tag/</link>
		<comments>/2010/03/04/does-firefox-play-mp4-h-264-within-the-html5-video-tag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stoimen]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Container formats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTP clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H.264/MPEG-4 AVC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H.264/MPEG-4 AVC products and implementations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High-definition television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPEG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPEG-4 Part 14]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology/Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video codecs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Firefox has declared it will play only open formats within the HTML5 video tag support. But however is there any way to play video with the mp4 h.264 codec under FF with no plugin support? That is the question.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href="/2010/03/05/video-sites-must-use-mp4-and-only-mp4/" rel="bookmark" title="Video sites must use &#8230; mp4 and only mp4!">Video sites must use &#8230; mp4 and only mp4! </a></li>
<li><a href="/2011/01/27/few-thoughts-on-web-video/" rel="bookmark" title="Few Thoughts on Web Video">Few Thoughts on Web Video </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/11/12/how-to-make-mp4-progressive-with-qt-faststart/" rel="bookmark" title="How to Make MP4 Progressive with qt-faststart">How to Make MP4 Progressive with qt-faststart </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/02/27/opera-supports-the-video-tag/" rel="bookmark" title="Opera supports the video tag!">Opera supports the video tag! </a></li>
</ol>
</div>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Firefox has declared it will play only open formats within the HTML5 video tag support. But however is there any way to play video with the mp4 h.264 codec under FF with no plugin support?</p>
<p>That is the question.</p>
<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>
<p>Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href="/2010/03/05/video-sites-must-use-mp4-and-only-mp4/" rel="bookmark" title="Video sites must use &#8230; mp4 and only mp4!">Video sites must use &#8230; mp4 and only mp4! </a></li>
<li><a href="/2011/01/27/few-thoughts-on-web-video/" rel="bookmark" title="Few Thoughts on Web Video">Few Thoughts on Web Video </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/11/12/how-to-make-mp4-progressive-with-qt-faststart/" rel="bookmark" title="How to Make MP4 Progressive with qt-faststart">How to Make MP4 Progressive with qt-faststart </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/02/27/opera-supports-the-video-tag/" rel="bookmark" title="Opera supports the video tag!">Opera supports the video tag! </a></li>
</ol></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>/2010/03/04/does-firefox-play-mp4-h-264-within-the-html5-video-tag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What’s groovy in Firebug 1.5</title>
		<link>/2010/01/21/what%e2%80%99s-groovy-in-firebug-1-5/</link>
		<comments>/2010/01/21/what%e2%80%99s-groovy-in-firebug-1-5/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stoimen]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firebug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTP clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology/Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now Firebug 1.5 is out in the wild. What really impressed me is the significant difference between the last version and the really user friendly interface it gives. One of my favorite features is that you can now sort the different columns in the Net panel. Now you can clearly see what’s the biggest component &#8230; <a href="/2010/01/21/what%e2%80%99s-groovy-in-firebug-1-5/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">What’s groovy in Firebug 1.5</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href="/2010/02/02/profiling-javascript-with-firebug-console-profile-console-time/" rel="bookmark" title="Profiling JavaScript with Firebug. console.profile() &#038; console.time()!">Profiling JavaScript with Firebug. console.profile() &#038; console.time()! </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/02/02/firebugs-console-time-accuracy/" rel="bookmark" title="Firebug&#8217;s console.time() accuracy">Firebug&#8217;s console.time() accuracy </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/03/04/does-firefox-play-mp4-h-264-within-the-html5-video-tag/" rel="bookmark" title="Does Firefox play mp4 h.264 within the HTML5 video tag?">Does Firefox play mp4 h.264 within the HTML5 video tag? </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/06/29/html5-geolocation-what-if-the-user-doesnt-share-his-position/" rel="bookmark" title="HTML5 geolocation &#8211; What If the User Doesn&#8217;t Share His Position?">HTML5 geolocation &#8211; What If the User Doesn&#8217;t Share His Position? </a></li>
</ol>
</div>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now Firebug 1.5 is out in the wild. What really impressed me is the significant difference between the last version and the really user friendly interface it gives.</p>
<p>One of my favorite features is that you can now sort the different columns in the Net panel. Now you can clearly see what’s the biggest component and what makes more traffic. This helps a lot once you decide to optimize the web page you’re watching.</p>
<p>Another good tool is that you can see the computed style, which however is only for Firefox and gives you partial information about all styles in different browsers, but it’s useful though.</p>
<p>I was pretty impressed by this version and I’d like to recommend it!</p>
<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>
<p>Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href="/2010/02/02/profiling-javascript-with-firebug-console-profile-console-time/" rel="bookmark" title="Profiling JavaScript with Firebug. console.profile() &#038; console.time()!">Profiling JavaScript with Firebug. console.profile() &#038; console.time()! </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/02/02/firebugs-console-time-accuracy/" rel="bookmark" title="Firebug&#8217;s console.time() accuracy">Firebug&#8217;s console.time() accuracy </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/03/04/does-firefox-play-mp4-h-264-within-the-html5-video-tag/" rel="bookmark" title="Does Firefox play mp4 h.264 within the HTML5 video tag?">Does Firefox play mp4 h.264 within the HTML5 video tag? </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/06/29/html5-geolocation-what-if-the-user-doesnt-share-his-position/" rel="bookmark" title="HTML5 geolocation &#8211; What If the User Doesn&#8217;t Share His Position?">HTML5 geolocation &#8211; What If the User Doesn&#8217;t Share His Position? </a></li>
</ol></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>/2010/01/21/what%e2%80%99s-groovy-in-firebug-1-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
