unset($var1);
unset($var2);
unset($var3);

But as you can see from the PHP doc page of unset() this method takes optional parameter count.

void unset(mixed $var [, mixed $var [, mixed $...]])

So perhaps a better solution can be:

unset($var1, $var2, $var3);

It’s at least single lined!

Related posts:

1. PHP: What is More Powerful Than list()
2. PHP: What is More Powerful Than list() – Perhaps extract()
3. PHP Associative Arrays Coding Style

Size of ..

As we all know most of the cases a program execution time depends most from the input data. As I wrote in my post the degree of the input data estimates the algorithm complexity.

Of course 3*n² is a bit faster than 5*n², but in general both functions are similar and have the same complexity. In this case we tend to say that the size of the input data is n.

It is easy to bind this to arrays or other simple data structures. For example when sorting an array with n elements, the size of the input data is n, but sometimes there is not such an obvious relation between an algorithm and the size of the input data.

For instance when we’ve to search a path into a graph, than maybe the best way to describe the input data is by summing both the number of vertices and the number of edges.

Conclusion

However this is important when dealing with algorithms, because a mistake in the estimation of the input data size will result in wrong algorithm estimation at all

Related posts:

1. Friday Algorithms: A Data Structure: JavaScript Stack
2. Friday Algorithms: JavaScript Merge Sort
3. Friday Algorithms: JavaScript Bubble Sort

Recently I wrote about list() in PHP which is indeed very powerful when assigning variable values from array elements.

$a = array(10, array('here', 'are', 'some', 'tests'));
list($count, $list) = $a;

Actually my example in the post was not correct, because I wrote that you can pass an associative array, but the truth is that you cannot, and thus the array should be always with numeric keys. After noticing the comments of that post, and thanks to @Philip,  I searched a bit about how this problem can be overcome.

There is a Solution

As always PHP gives a perfect solution! You can see on the list() doc page that there is a function that may help you use an associative array.

Extract

extract() is perhaps less known than list(), but it does the right thing!

$a = array('count' => 10, 'list' => array('here', 'are', 'some', 'tests'));
extract($a);
 
echo $count;    // 10
print_r($list); // array('here'....

Note that now both $count and $list are defined.

Related posts:

1. PHP: What is More Powerful Than list()
2. Friday Algorithms: Quicksort – Difference Between PHP and JavaScript
3. The Better Way to Unset Variables in PHP

When a programmer sees a chunk of code he tends to evaluate it in a rather intuitive manner and to qualify it as “elegant” or not. This is quite easy, because it’s subjective and nobody knows what exactly elegant means. However behind this there is a powerful mathematical approach of measuring a program effectiveness.

It’s a pity that most of the developers still think of the big O notation as something from the university classes, but unusual in the practice and they barely use it their job. But before describing the big O notation, let me start from something really simple.

Let’s have the following example (note that all the examples are in PHP):

$n = 100;
$s = 0;
 
for ($i = 0; $i < $n; $i++) {
	for ($j = 0; $j < $n; $j++) {
		$s++;	
	}	
}

As you can see there are two assignments and two nested loops. This is really a widely used example from any algorithm book.

Constants, Languages, Compilers

First of all the time to assign a value to a variable, to compare two values and to increment a variable is constant. It depends on the computer resources, the compiler or the language, but it’s constant on one machine if you compare two chunks of code. Now we can see that these operations take (add) constant time to the program, and we can assume this time is respectively a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i.

$n = 100; 	// a
$s = 0;		// b
$i = 0; 	// c
$i < $n; 	// d
$i++;		// e
$j = 0; 	// f
$j < $n;	// g
$j++;		// h
$s++;		// i

What Matters?

Actually the most important thing here is the value of n. By assigning greater values to n the more time will take the program to run. As we can see from the following table by multiplying the value of n by 10, the time became 100 times more.

n		time
10		0.00002
100		0.002
...		...

What happens in fact is that we can sum all these values.

a + b + c + n*d + n*e + n*(f + n*g + n*h + n*i)

and by substituting:

a + b + c = k
d + e + n = l
g + h + i = m

the result is:

m*n² + l*n + k

Conclusion

Here the most important thing is the degree of n, because it can change dramatically the program time consumption depending on the n value. Thus this chunk has a quadratic complexity or O(n²).

Of course there are constants, but in the practice they are not so important. Take a look at these two functions:

f = 2*n²
g = 200*n

OK, for n = 1 the first one will be faster, but as n increments the second function becomes to be faster and faster, thus after a given value of n the second function is really the fastest!

Related posts:

1. jQuery: what about this.title?
2. Quick Look at JavaScript Objects
3. Firebug’s console.time() accuracy

What is list()?

Let’s assume you’ve two variables and one array with two elements:

$arr = array(1, 2);
$a = $arr[0];
$b = $arr[1];
// now a == 1, and b == 2

Maybe the easiest way to assign to the first variable the value of the first element of the array, and to the second variable the value of the second element of the array is to use list():

list($a, $b) = array(1, 2);
// again a == 1, and b == 2

Note that you can do the same with as many variables/array elements you want.

The funny thing is that nobody use it, while I see at least one perfect usage. You can think of a typical admin panel of any web system. For sure any developer has programmed the typical table page containing a list of “things” and a paging to switch the result set page. It’s like the posts page from the WordPress admin panel, or a search result page in Google, where you’ve one page of results and at the bottom – a number of pages where you can go to another page of the search results.

What I’ve seen in almost every project is that typically the developers prefer to set the results for the page into one list returned from one method and the count of the entire result set is returned by another method.

Thus most of the times there are two methods, performing most commonly a database queries. Something like – getList($offset, $limit) and getCount() where the first one returns the page and the second one returns the count of the result set.

This will result into two methods, two calls and two lines of code:

function getList($offset, $limit)
{
	...
	// although the entire result set contains
	// 5 elements by limiting it from the parameters
	// only three are returned
	return $list; // where $list = array('title1', 'title2', 'title3');	
}
 
function getCount()
{
	...
	// here's returned the count
	// of the entire result set
	return $count; // where $count = 5;	
}
 
$list  = getList(0, 3);
$count = getCount();

What actually you can do is to perform both queries in one method, perhaps called getItems($offset, $limit) where the returned value is an array containing both the list of results and the count:

function getItems($offset, $limit)
{
	...
	return array('list' => $list, 'count' => $count);
}

And finally when calling this method to list() that into the two variables – single lined.

list($list, $count) = getItems(0, 3);

Related posts:

1. PHP: What is More Powerful Than list() – Perhaps extract()
2. Friday Algorithms: Quicksort – Difference Between PHP and JavaScript
3. PHP: The Array Element Doesn’t Exist – Suppress the Warnings

var str = '/text/1/text/2/';
var a = str.match(/(\d+)/gi);
console.log(a);

in that example you’ll get an array with all the numbers in the string ["1", "2"] – yet another flexible js snippet!

Related posts:

1. Flexible JavaScript – Splitting Strings
2. Flexible JavaScript – Replace in a String
3. Quick Look at JavaScript Objects

var str = 'my simple string';
str.replace(/ /g, '-'); // now 'str' will contain 'my-simple-string'

Related posts:

1. Flexible JavaScript – Splitting Strings
2. JavaScript Flexibility – Regex match()
3. What make JavaScript closures work?

var str = 'my-long-string';
str.split('-')[0]; // will contain "my"

the 1st and 2nd indexes contain respectively “long” and “string”!

Related posts:

1. Flexible JavaScript – Replace in a String
2. JavaScript Flexibility – Regex match()
3. JavaScript Snippets: IF Statements Optimization

I’m sure this is not the first time you’ve been asked this question. However there’s nobody today that doesn’t wonder the answer. For me – yes, twitter can replace the RSS feed readers, and NO – feed readers are awsome!

Yes

First of all why do I use a feed reader? I’m simply seeing what’s in it and barely read the article from the reader, but rather I jump to the site, and what’s happening often in twitter is the same scenario, I just see what’s in the tweet and if it seems to be interesting to me I jump to the link (if there’s a link). The good thing is that the tweets are limited and I’m focused. That’s why twitter is my favorite social site. I can follow all of the interesting people I know from their blogs. So perhaps twitter is becoming more useful than the feed readers.

No

In other hand in twitter you’ve to stay all the day long to get all the tweets you need. The timeline is quickly changing and sometimes you get lots of “junk”. While in the feed reader you’ve all the “important” posts as an incoming mail. You cannot miss anything! That’s why I cannot forget the feed readers they are doing a great job!

Related posts:

1. Change the Viewport, be Ready for the iPhone!
2. Check YouTube Video Existence with Zend_Gdata_YouTube
3. Make your own link shortener

$data = array(...);
$this->_helper->json($data);

Related posts:

1. Returning JSON in a Zend Controller’s Action
2. JSON and Zend Framework? – Zend_Json
3. AJAX dataTypes in jQuery. Format and access.