<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bind Zend Action with Non-Default View &#8211; Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="/2010/06/23/bind-zend-action-with-non-default-view-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2010/06/23/bind-zend-action-with-non-default-view-part-2/</link>
	<description>on web development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 21:40:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Passaglia</title>
		<link>/2010/06/23/bind-zend-action-with-non-default-view-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-14298</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrea Passaglia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 12:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1664#comment-14298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the good work. I already knew about solution 1 but I was looking for something that doesn&#039;t involve creating empty actions. You should aim for action as simple as possible, that&#039;s true, but I have to render a &quot;not implemented&quot; error, in the developing stage, so there is really no need for some action that I will delete anyway and that could possibly create confusion looking at the code. At the other hand, having just a view script make things much clearer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the good work. I already knew about solution 1 but I was looking for something that doesn&#8217;t involve creating empty actions. You should aim for action as simple as possible, that&#8217;s true, but I have to render a &#8220;not implemented&#8221; error, in the developing stage, so there is really no need for some action that I will delete anyway and that could possibly create confusion looking at the code. At the other hand, having just a view script make things much clearer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
